Archive for the ‘VOIP’ Category

Conferencing in a VoIP World

Thursday, May 7th, 2009
If you’ve been following the business communications space recently, you’re keenly aware of emphasis on cost reduction and collaboration — two seemingly conflicting goals. The truth is, those two ends are precisely what conferencing providers deliver to their customers, and they are seeing increased demand for their services.
 
That demand, according to recent research, is resulting a 28 percent compound annual growth rate (CAGR) — which means it will soon eclipse 50 billion minutes of use annually.
 
Want to put a dollar figure on that?
 
Looking at conference bridges alone — that’s excluding the service element — Frost & Sullivan (News - Alert) says that market will hit the $200 million mark by 2014.
 
AMI Partners says the audio conferencing market for SMBs, specifically, will hit $2.6 billion by 2012 and that video conferencing will grow to $164 million by 2012, up from $100 million reported in 2006.
 
So, there’s definitely a growing demand, driven by the economy, and exacerbated at times by specific events like the swine flu epidemic, which simply offers an opportunity for service providers to highlight the benefits of their conferencing solutions.
 
Naturally, increased demand tends to entice new providers to enter the market — some entirely new, others are existing players adding conferencing capabilities to their offerings. It’s the same phenomenon that created a seemingly endless supply of localized VoIP providers a few years back.  Either way, the end result it that competition is growing, and service providers have to leverage technology in order to succeed — meaning, they need to be able to find ways to deliver their conferencing services more efficiently and more affordably and more reliably. 
 
As with any communications service today, the obvious answer is to look to an all-IP architecture, which will allows providers to not only reduce their own costs, but also to cut time to market with new, innovative solutions that will deliver the cost efficiencies and productivity enhancements businesses are so desperately seeking. That includes features like, integrated voice and Web communication, click to conference capabilities, calendar integration, mobile conferencing, and even video.  The key is that providers can do it in a way that allows them to easily scale to meet future growth demands, without the fear of having to replace their hardware as they grow.
 
As a service provider, if you want to survive in this new, next generation communications market, making the move to all-IP is not a question of if, but when. To that end, there’s no time like the present, especially with the capabilities of today’s IP media servers, which perform real-time processing of media streams in an IP environment, reduce the cost per port, and significantly reduce physical footprint — all while leveraging open standard increasing your ability to leverage existing and future equipment from other vendors as you build out your IP networks.
 
Today’s IP media servers are also flexible enough to accommodate future needs, having been designed to enable you to, for instance, layer additional telepresence or video conferencing offerings as they become necessary, again without having to replace your infrastructure allowing you to further develop new revenue streams quickly and cost effectively.
 
I hosted a Webinar earlier today, called, Untapped Opportunities in Audio Conferencing, which featured Marc Beattie, Managing Partner and Principle Analyst at Wainhouse Research. Marc’s focus is the collaboration & conferencing markets, and he brings with him a wealth of experience from earlier stints at PictureTel and Polycom. Adding to the discussion on trends in the conferencing space, Marc was followed by Ray Adensamer, senior product marketing manager at RadiSys (News - Alert), which develops the media servers that help CSPs quickly and cost effectively bring their conferencing services to market.
By Erik Linask, Group Managing Editor , www.TMCNet.Com.  More of the article can be found at http://www.conferencingnews.com/news/24737.

VOIP Overview

Monday, March 30th, 2009

VoIP stands for Voice over Internet Protocol. This phenomenon has made a profound change in the world of telephone communications. The traditional method of making calls the landlines are being fats replaced by this technology that has taken the world by storm. Not only is this method economical as this does not involve the telephony company charges that are pretty heavy, it also gives you better coverage.

This works through the broadband and uses the World Wide Web to route its calls. The best thing about it is that the person who you are calling through the internet phone need not necessarily have it also to receive your call. A technology that has brought a revolution in our worlds at least deserves that we look into its history.

Voice over Internet Protocol, VoIP or Broadband phone service as it is often referred to, is changing the telephony world. Traditional phone lines are slowly being phased out as businesses and households around the world embrace the benefits and features that VoIP technology has to offer.

VoIP is, in simple terms, the process of breaking up voice/audio into small chunks (or packets), compressing the chunks, transmitting those chunks over an IP network (e.g. the Internet), and reassembling those chunks at the receiving end, so that two people can communicate using voice/audio.

The history of VoIP shows that this technology started as far back as 1995 when a small company called Vocaltec released, what was believed to be, the first internet phone software. This software was designed to run on a home PC and much like the PC phones used today, it utilized sound cards, microphones and speakers. The software was called “Internet Phone” and used the H.323 protocol instead of the SIP protocol that is more prevalent today. Vocaltec had initial success with Internet Phone, and had a successful IPO in 1996. It was the Skype of the mid 90s. A major drawback in 1995 was the lack of broadband availability, and as such, this software used modems which resulted in poor voice quality when compared to a normal telephone call.

By 1998, VoIP traffic had grown to represent approximately 1% of all voice traffic in the United States. Entrepreneurs were jumping on the bandwagon and were creating devices which enabled PC-to-phone and phone-to-phone communication. Networking manufacturers such as Cisco and Lucent introduced equipment that could route and switch the VoIP traffic and as a result by the year 2000, VoIP traffic accounted for more than 3% of all voice traffic.

 

PSTN and mobile network providers

 

It is becoming increasingly common for telecommunications providers to use VoIP telephony over dedicated and public IP networks to connect switching stations and to interconnect with other telephony network providers (this is often referred to as ‘IP backhaul’).

 

Many telecommunications companies are looking at the IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) which will merge Internet technologies with the mobile world, using a pure VoIP infrastructure. It will enable them to upgrade their existing systems while embracing Internet technologies such as the Web, email, instant messaging, presence, and video conferencing. It will also allow existing VoIP systems to interface with the conventional PSTN and mobile phone networks.

 

“Dual mode” telephone sets, which allow for the seamless handover between a cellular network and a Wi-Fi network, are expected to help VoIP become more popular.

 

Phones such as the NEC N900iL, many of the Nokia Eseries and several other Wi-Fi enabled mobile phones have SIP clients built into the firmware. Such clients operate independently of the mobile phone network (however some operators choose to remove the client from subsidised handsets). Some operators such as Vodafone actively try to block VoIP traffic from their network. Others, like T-Mobile, have refused to interconnect with VoIP-enabled networks as was seen in the legal case between T-Mobile and Truphone, which ultimately was settled in the UK High Court in favour of the VoIP carrier.

 

VoIP can facilitate tasks and provide services that may be more difficult to implement using the PSTN. Examples include:

 

The ability to transmit more than one telephone call over the same broadband connection. This can make VoIP a simple way to add an extra telephone line to a home or office.

 

Secure calls using standardized protocols (such as Secure Real-time Transport Protocol.) Most of the difficulties of creating a secure phone connection over traditional phone lines, like digitizing and digital transmission, are already in place with VoIP. It is only necessary to encrypt and authenticate the existing data stream.

 

Location independence. Only an Internet connection is needed to get a connection to a VoIP provider. For instance, call center agents using VoIP phones can work from anywhere with a sufficiently fast and stable Internet connection.

 

Integration with other services available over the Internet, including video conversation, message or data file exchange in parallel with the conversation, audio conferencing, managing address books, and passing information about whether others (e.g., friends or colleagues) are available to interested parties.

 

Because the underlying IP network is inherently unreliable, in contrast to the circuit-switched public telephone network, and does not inherently provide a mechanism to ensure that data packets are delivered in sequential order, or provide Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees, VoIP implementations face problems mitigating latency and jitter.

 

Voice travels over IP networks in packets in the same manner as data, so when you talk over an IP network your conversation is broken up into small packets. These voice and data packets travel over the same network with a fixed bandwidth. This system is more prone to congestion[citation needed] and DoS attacks than traditional circuit switched systems.

 

Fixed delays cannot be controlled (as they are caused by the physical distance the packets travel), however some delays can be minimized by marking voice packets as being delay-sensitive (see, for example, DiffServ). Fixed delays are especially problematic when satellite circuits are involved, due to long round-trip propagation delay (400–600 milliseconds for links through geostationary satellites).

 

A cause of packet loss and delay is congestion, which can be avoided by means of teletraffic engineering.

 

The receiving node must restructure IP packets that may be out of order, delayed or missing, while ensuring that the audio stream maintains a proper time consistency. Variation in delay is called jitter. The effects of jitter can be mitigated by storing voice packets in a jitter buffer upon arrival and before producing analog audio, although this further increases delay. This avoids a condition known as buffer underrun, in which the voice engine is missing audio since the next voice packet has not yet arrived. When IP packets are lost or delayed at any point in the network between VoIP users there will be a momentary dropout of voice if all packet delay and loss mechanisms cannot compensate.

 

It has been suggested to rely on the packetized nature of media in VoIP communications and transmit the stream of packets from the source phone to the destination phone simultaneously across different routes (multi-path routing). In such a way, temporary failures have less impact on the communication quality. In capillary routing it has been suggested to use at the packet level Fountain codes or particularly raptor codes for transmitting extra redundant packets making the communication more reliable.[citation needed]

 

A number of protocols have been defined to support the reporting of QoS/QoE for VoIP calls. These include RTCP XR (RFC3611), SIP RTCP Summary Reports, H.460.9 Annex B (for H.323), H.248.30 and MGCP extensions. The RFC3611 VoIP Metrics block is generated by an IP phone or gateway during a live call and contains information on packet loss rate, packet discard rate (due to jitter), packet loss/discard burst metrics (burst length/density, gap length/density), network delay, end system delay, signal / noise / echo level, MOS scores and R factors and configuration information related to the jitter buffer.

 

RFC3611 VoIP metrics reports are exchanged between IP endpoints on an occasional basis during a call, and an end of call message sent via SIP RTCP Summary Report or one of the other signaling protocol extensions. RFC3611 VoIP metrics reports are intended to support real time feedback related to QoS problems, the exchange of information between the endpoints for improved call quality calculation and a variety of other applications.